Canal and nerve-space review
Level-by-level central canal, lateral recess and neural foraminal categories, with supporting canal AP measurements.
MRILevel-by-level review
Lumbar MRI findings, organised for your review.
Review AI-assisted disc, stenosis and alignment findings alongside the source study, then edit the structured report draft.
AI-assisted outputs for review by a qualified clinician.
RadEze · Lumbar MRI
Input
Non-contrast lumbar MRI. Sagittal T2 is required; sagittal T1 and axial T2 support additional assessments when present.
Output
Viewer review panel and a structured Word/PDF report draft for radiologist review.
Coverage
T12–L1 through L5–S1
Inside the workflow
Clear outputs.
Reviewable decisions.
Disc assessment
Disc contour, posterior extension, disc height, Pfirrmann degeneration grade and selected endplate findings.
Alignment and vertebrae
Listhesis measurements, lumbar lordosis, vertebral heights and level labelling in the review workflow.
Supported scope
What this module brings to review.
| Finding or measurement | AI-assisted output |
|---|---|
| Central canal stenosis | Normal/mild, moderate or severe; supporting AP diameter in mm |
| Lateral recess stenosis | Left and right: normal/mild, moderate or severe |
| Neural foraminal stenosis | Left and right: normal, moderate or severe |
| Disc contour | Normal, bulge or protrusion; posterior extension and thecal-sac indentation |
| Disc degeneration | Pfirrmann grades 1–5 |
| Disc height | Preserved or reduced |
| Modic endplate change | Presence flag; typing remains radiologist-entered |
| Endplate change | Superior and inferior endplate review |
| Annular fissure | Possible flag only |
| Spondylolisthesis | Antero-/retrolisthesis measurements and Meyerding-equivalent category |
| L5–S1 translation | Translation measurement in mm |
| Lumbar lordosis | L1–S1 Cobb angle, category and segmental angles |
| Vertebral body morphology | Genant-style height and deformity measurements for review |
| Schmorl’s nodes | Endplate-level flags |
| Vertebral labelling | T12 through S1 |
| Canal AP diameter | Sagittal and axial supporting measurements |
How it fits
AI beside the clinician.
Review at every step.
Start with the supported study
Confirm the modality, views and sequences required by the selected module.
Check the AI output in context
Review the proposed findings or measurements against the source images. Correct and complete the assessment.
Review, edit and finalise
Use the draft report as a starting point. The qualified clinician retains responsibility for the final interpretation.
RadEze AI supports qualified clinical review. AI proposals, measurements and report drafts require image verification and clinical correlation before use.
Common questions
Know what you’re evaluating.
Does the AI replace a radiologist?
No. The AI organises supported findings or measurements and prepares draft outputs. A qualified clinician checks the images, edits as needed and finalises the report.
What is the difference between RadEze AI and RadRep?
RadEze AI works with medical images and their supported analysis workflows. RadRep focuses on turning dictated findings into structured report drafts.
Can we use this with our existing workflow?
Show our team your PACS, reporting process and supported study types. We’ll confirm the appropriate deployment and integration options for your setting.
How do we arrange a demo or discuss pricing?
Use the enquiry form below or email sales@ezewok.com. The team will confirm the module scope, availability and commercial details for your organisation and country.
See the workflow
Let’s find the right fit for your team.
Tell us what you review and how your team works. We’ll follow up about the relevant product demonstration.
- Explore the supported views and outputs
- See the image-review and report workflow
- Discuss onboarding, availability and pricing
Prefer email?
sales@ezewok.com ↗
Explore the suite