Motion by level
Organise flexion/extension translation and angular motion in the measurement workflow.
X-rayMotion and alignment
Make lumbar motion measurements part of a clear review workflow.
Review AI-proposed landmarks and level-by-level measurements across supported lumbar views, then check the structured output before issuing a report.
AI-assisted outputs for review by a qualified clinician.
RadEze · Lumbar X-ray
Input
Lumbar lateral neutral, flexion and extension views. Spinopelvic measurements need appropriately visible femoral heads.
Output
Adjustable landmark proposals, derived measurements and a structured report for clinician review.
Coverage
Lumbar landmarks across L1–S1
Inside the workflow
Clear outputs.
Reviewable decisions.
Landmarks you can review
Inspect AI-proposed points against the X-ray and correct them in the supported viewer workflow.
Structured measurements
Bring alignment, disc-height and vertebral-slip measurements together for clinical correlation.
Supported scope
What this module brings to review.
| Finding or measurement | AI-assisted output |
|---|---|
| Translation | Flexion/extension motion measurement |
| Angular motion | Segmental angular measurement |
| George’s line | Posterior vertebral alignment |
| Spondylolisthesis | mm, percentage and Meyerding category |
| Lumbar lordosis | L1–S1 and segmental Cobb angles |
| Harrison posterior tangent | Angular measurements |
| Lumbar stress lines | Measured alignment references |
| Baseline convergence | Measured alignment references |
| Ferguson angle | Lumbosacral angle |
| L3 offset | Anterior/posterior offset |
| Vertebral wedge | Height-ratio measurement |
| Biconcave index | Structural ratio for review |
| Disc height | Measurement and Kettler category |
| Canal size | Canal-to-body ratio and supporting AP measurement |
| Pelvic incidence | When femoral-head references are visible |
| Pelvic tilt | When femoral-head references are visible |
| Sacral slope | With adequate lumbopelvic reference anatomy |
How it fits
AI beside the clinician.
Review at every step.
Start with the supported study
Confirm the modality, views and sequences required by the selected module.
Check the AI output in context
Review the proposed findings or measurements against the source images. Correct and complete the assessment.
Review, edit and finalise
Use the draft report as a starting point. The qualified clinician retains responsibility for the final interpretation.
RadEze AI supports qualified clinical review. AI proposals, measurements and report drafts require image verification and clinical correlation before use.
Common questions
Know what you’re evaluating.
Does the AI replace a radiologist?
No. The AI organises supported findings or measurements and prepares draft outputs. A qualified clinician checks the images, edits as needed and finalises the report.
What is the difference between RadEze AI and RadRep?
RadEze AI works with medical images and their supported analysis workflows. RadRep focuses on turning dictated findings into structured report drafts.
Can we use this with our existing workflow?
Show our team your PACS, reporting process and supported study types. We’ll confirm the appropriate deployment and integration options for your setting.
How do we arrange a demo or discuss pricing?
Use the enquiry form below or email sales@ezewok.com. The team will confirm the module scope, availability and commercial details for your organisation and country.
See the workflow
Let’s find the right fit for your team.
Tell us what you review and how your team works. We’ll follow up about the relevant product demonstration.
- Explore the supported views and outputs
- See the image-review and report workflow
- Discuss onboarding, availability and pricing
Prefer email?
sales@ezewok.com ↗
Explore the suite